Technology
Meet the 21-year-old serving to coders importance AI to cheat in Google and alternative tech activity interviews
An individual walks day the doorway to a Google construction in Dublin, Feb. 15, 2023.
Artur Widak | Anadolu | Getty Pictures
Upcoming touchdown internship deals from Amazon, Meta and TikTok, laptop science pupil Chungin “Roy” Lee has determined to proceed to San Francisco.
However he gained’t be becoming a member of any of the ones corporations.
In lieu, Lee will likely be construction his personal startup that deals a ordinary provider: serving to instrument engineers importance synthetic knowledge to cheat of their technical activity interviews.
“Everyone programs nowadays with the help of AI,” mentioned Lee, a 21-year-old pupil at Columbia College, which has opened disciplinary complaints in opposition to him, in line with paperwork seen by means of CNBC. A Columbia spokesperson mentioned the college doesn’t touch upon person scholars.
“It doesn’t make sense to have an interview format that assumes you don’t have the use of AI,” Lee mentioned.
Lee is at the leading edge of a motion amongst skilled coders who’re exploiting the restrictions of faraway activity interviews, popularized right through the Covid pandemic, by means of the use of AI gear off digital camera to assure they provide hiring managers the most efficient conceivable solutions.
The hiring procedure that took secure within the work-from-home age concerned applicants interviewing from at the back of a Zoom display screen in lieu than touring, occasionally around the nation, for on-location interviews, the place they might display their coding talents on dry-erase forums.
In overdue 2022 got here the growth in generative AI, with the leave of OpenAI’s ChatGPT. Since next, tech corporations have laid off tens of hundreds of programmers past touting the importance of AI to write down code. At Google, for instance, greater than 25% of unused code is written by means of AI, CEO Sundar Pichai instructed traders in October.
The mix of speedy developments in AI, aggregate layoffs of instrument builders, and a seamless global of faraway and hybrid office has created a copy conundrum for recruiters.
The situation has change into so popular that Pichai instructed right through a Google the town corridor in February that his hiring managers believe going back on in-person activity interviews.
Google isn’t the one tech corporate weighing that concept.
However engineers aren’t slowing ailing.
Lee has grew to become his dishonest right into a industry. His corporate, Interview Coder, markets itself as a provider that is helping instrument builders cheat right through activity interviews. The internship deals that he landed are the evidence he makes use of to turn that his generation works.
AI assistants for digital interviews can handover written code, form code enhancements, and generate colorful explanations of effects that applicants can learn. The AI gear all office temporarily, which is beneficial for timed interviews.
Hiring managers are venting their frustrations on social media over the arise of AI cheaters, pronouncing that those that get stuck are eradicated from rivalry. Interviewers say they’re exhausted from having to discern whether or not applicants are the use of their very own talents or depending on AI.
‘Secret’ assistance
The dishonest gear depend on generative AI fashions to handover instrument engineers with real-time solutions to coding issues as they’re introduced right through interviews. The AI analyzes each written and oral questions and instantaneously generates code. The widgets too can handover the cheaters with explanations for the answers that they are able to importance within the interview.
The gear’ maximum decent property, alternatively, could be their secrecy. Interview Coder is mysterious to the interviewer.
Future applicants are the use of generation to cheat, employers are looking at their habits right through interviews to aim to catch them. Interviewers have realized to search for sights wandering to the facet, the mirrored image of alternative apps optic on applicants’ glasses, and solutions that pitch rehearsed or don’t fit questions, amongst alternative clues.
Possibly the largest inform is an easy “Hmm.”
Hiring managers mentioned they’ve spotted that many applicants importance the ever present pitch to shop for themselves pace past looking forward to their AI gear to complete their office.
“I’ll hear a pause, then ‘Hmm,’ and all of a sudden, it’s the perfect answer,” mentioned Anna Spearman, founding father of Techie Staffing, an company that is helping corporations fill technical roles. “There have also been instances where the code looked OK, but they couldn’t describe how they came to the conclusion.”
Henry Kirk, a instrument developer and co-founder of Studio.init in Pristine York, mentioned this sort of dishonest old to be simple to catch.
“But now it’s harder to detect,” mentioned Kirk. He mentioned the generation has gotten intriguing plenty to give the solutions in a park that doesn’t require customers to proceed their sights.
“The eye movement used to be the biggest giveaway,” Kirk mentioned.
Interview Coder’s site says its digital interview device is released to display screen detection options which are to be had to corporations on services and products akin to Zoom and Google Meet. Lee markets his product as being webcam-proof.
When Kirk hosted a digital coding problem for an engineering activity he used to be having a look to fill in June, 700 family implemented, he mentioned. Kirk recorded the method of the primary interview spherical. He used to be having a look to look if any applicants have been dishonest in ways in which incorporated the use of effects from immense language fashions.
“More than 50% of them cheated,” he mentioned.
AI dishonest gear have progressed such a lot over the endmost 12 months that they’ve change into just about undetectable, professionals mentioned. Alternative than Lee’s Interview Coder, instrument engineers too can importance systems akin to Leetcode Wizard or ChatGPT.
Kirk mentioned his startup is thinking about shifting to in-person interviews, regardless that he is aware of that probably limits the ability pond.
“The problem is now I don’t trust the results as much,” Kirk mentioned. “I don’t know what else to do other than on-site.”
Google CEO Sundar Pichai right through an tournament on the Google for Startups Campus in Warsaw, Poland, Feb. 13, 2025.
Omar Marques | Anadolu | Getty Pictures
Again to the Googleplex
It’s change into a heavy subject at Google, and one Pichai addressed in February at an inside the town corridor assembly, the place executives learn questions and feedback that have been submitted by means of staff and summarized by means of AI, in line with an audio recording that used to be reviewed by means of CNBC.
One query requested of control used to be, “Can we get onsite job interviews back?”
“There are many email threads about this topic,” the query mentioned. “If budget is constraint, can we get the candidates to an office or environment we can control?”
Pichai grew to become to Brian Ong, Google’s vice chairman of recruiting, who used to be becoming a member of via a digital livestream.
“Brian, do we do hybrid?” Pichai requested.
Ong mentioned applicants and Google staff have mentioned they like digital activity interviews as a result of scheduling a video name is more uncomplicated than discovering a pace to satisfy in to be had convention rooms. The digital interview procedure is set two weeks quicker, he added.
He mentioned interviewers are prompt to probe applicants on their solutions with the intention to decipher whether or not they if truth be told know what they’re speaking about.
“We definitely have more work to do to integrate how AI is now more prevalent in the interview process,” mentioned Ong. He mentioned his recruiting group is operating with Google’s instrument engineer guidance committee to determine how the corporate can refine its interviewing procedure.
“Given we all work hybrid, I think it’s worth thinking about some fraction of the interviews being in person,” Pichai replied. “I think it’ll help both the candidates understand Google’s culture and I think it’s good for both sides.”
Ong mentioned it’s additionally a subject matter “all of our other competitor companies are looking at.”
A Google spokesperson declined to remark past what used to be mentioned on the assembly.
Alternative corporations have already shifted their hiring practices to account for AI dishonest.
Deloitte reinstated in-person interviews for its U.Okay. graduate program, in line with a September report.
Anthropic, the maker of AI chatbot Claude, issued unused steering in its activity programs in February, asking applicants to not importance AI assistants right through the hiring procedure.
“While we encourage people to use AI systems during their role to help them work faster and more effectively, please do not use AI assistants during the application process,” the unused coverage says. “We want to understand your personal interest in Anthropic without mediation through an AI system, and we also want to evaluate your non-AI-assisted communication skills. Please indicate ‘Yes’ if you have read and agree.”
Amazon could also be taking steps to fight AI dishonest.
The corporate asks that applicants recognize that they gained’t importance unauthorized gear right through the interview or evaluation procedure, spokesperson Margaret Callahan instructed CNBC.
Chungin “Roy” Lee, a 21-year-old pupil at Columbia College, is the founding father of Interview Coder, a startup that makes instrument to assistance laptop programmers cheat in activity interviews with the assistance of AI.
Courtesy of Chungin Lee
‘F*ck Leetcode’
When you consult with InterviewCoder.co, the very first thing that greets you is immense grey kind that reads “F*ck Leetcode.”
Leetcode is this system old by means of many tech corporations to guage instrument engineers for technical roles. Tech corporations akin to Meta, Google and Amazon importance it to stock tabs at the hundreds of activity candidates they review.
“Every time I mention interviews, I get frustrated comments about Leetcode,” wrote Ryan Peterman, a instrument engineer at Meta, in a newsletter posted on Substack in December. Peterman mentioned Leetcode issues are purposely designed to be a lot tougher than what instrument engineers would do at the activity. Leetcode is the most efficient device corporations need to filter out masses of candidates, Peterman wrote.
Coders mentioned they abhor Leetcode as it emphasizes algorithmic problem-solving and asks candidates to unravel riddles and puzzles that appear inappropriate to the activity, in line with the ones CNBC spoke with in addition to feedback CNBC discovered from engineers throughout diverse social media platforms. Every other problem is that it occasionally calls for hours of labor that would possibly not lead to a role do business in or development, they mentioned.
Leetcode served as Lee’s inspiration for construction Interview Coder, Lee mentioned. With the assistance of AI, he mentioned, he created the provider in not up to a life.
“I thought I wanted to work at a big tech company and spent 600 hours practicing for Leetcode,” Lee mentioned. “It made me miserable, and I almost stopped programming because of how much I didn’t like it.”
Lee’s social media posts are stuffed with feedback from alternative programmers expressing alike frustrations.
“Legend,” a number of feedback mentioned in reaction to a couple of his X posts. Others mentioned they loved him “f—ing with big tech.”
Rival instrument Leetcode Charmer used to be additionally impressed by means of distaste for Leetcode.
Isabel De Vries, Leetcode Charmer’s head of promoting, instructed CNBC in a remark that Leetcode-style interviews fail to correctly measure engineering talents and fail to mirror unedited day-to-day engineering office.
“Our product originates from the same frustrations many of our users are having,” De Vries mentioned.
Leetcode didn’t reply to CNBC’s request for remark.
Henry Kirk, a instrument developer and co-founder of Studio.init in Pristine York, is thinking about shifting activity interviews to be on website in line with instrument engineers the use of AI to cheat in digital interviews.
Photograph by means of Krista Schlueter for Inc. Album
When Kirk, of Studio.init, posted on LinkedIn in February to vent about his frustrations with AI dishonest, he won just about 200 feedback. However maximum argued that employers must permit applicants to importance AI within the hiring procedure.
“Even the SAT lets you use a calculator,” mentioned one remark. “I think you just make it harder to succeed on purpose when in the real world Google and gpt will always be at my fingertips.”
Lee promotes Interview Coder as being “invisible to all screen-recording softwares.” To turn out its effectiveness, he recorded himself passing an Amazon interview and posted the video on YouTube. Amazon and the alternative corporations that had made deals to Lee next rescinded them.
Lee were given masses of feedback praising the video, which YouTube got rid of next CNBC reached out to Amazon and Google for this tale. YouTube cited a “copyright claim” by means of Amazon as the cause of casting off the video.
“I as an interviewer am so annoyed by him but as a candidate also adore him,” former Meta group of workers engineer Yangshun Tay, co-founder of startup GreatFrontEnd, wrote in a LinkedIn post about Lee and his video. “Cheating isn’t right, but oh god I am so tired of these stupid algorithm interviews.”
Upcoming YouTube got rid of the video, Lee uploaded it once again.
Dishonest as a provider
Lee mentioned he by no means deliberate to office at Amazon, Meta or TikTok. He mentioned he sought after to turn others simply how simple it’s to recreation Leetcode and pressure corporations to discover a higher additional.
And, he mentioned, he’s earning money within the procedure.
Interview Coder is to be had as a subscription for $60 a occasion. Lee mentioned the corporate is heading in the right direction to clash $1 million in annual ordinary earnings by means of mid-Might.
He lately rented the web influencers who exit by means of the identify “Costco Guys” to form a video advertising and marketing his instrument.
“If you’re struggling to pass your Leetcode interviews and want to get a job at a big tech company, you’ve got to take a look at Interviewcoder.co to pass your interview,” the Costco Guys say of their video. “Because Interview Coder gets five big booms! Boom! Boom! Boom! Boom! Boooooom!”
Leetcode Charmer expenses itself on its site as “The #1 AI-powered coding interview cheating app” and “The perfect tool for achieving a ‘Strong Hire’ result in any coding interview and landing your dream job at any FAANG company.” Leetcode Charmer fees 49 euros ($53) a occasion for a “Pro” subscription.
Greater than 16,000 family have old the app, and “several hundred” family have instructed Leetcode Charmer that they won deals due to the instrument, the corporate instructed CNBC.
“Our product will have succeeded once we can shut it down, when leetcode interviews are a thing of the past,” De Vries mentioned.
Lee mentioned he’s shifting from Pristine York to San Francisco in March to proceed construction Interview Coder and get started running on his later corporate.
Kirk mentioned he understands instrument engineers’ frustration with Leetcode and the tech trade. He’s needed to importance Leetcode various occasions all the way through his occupation, and he used to be laid off by means of Google in 2023. He now needs to assistance out-of-work engineers get jobs.
However he remainder fearful that AI dishonest will persist.
“We need to make sure they know their stuff because these tools still make mistakes,” Kirk mentioned.
Part of businesses recently importance AI within the hiring procedure, and 68% will by means of the tip of 2025, in line with an October survey commissioned by means of ResumeBuilder.com.
Lee mentioned that if corporations need to invoice themselves as AI-first, they must inspire its importance by means of applicants.
Requested if he worries about instrument engineers dropping the consider of the tech trade, Lee paused.
“Hmm,” he mumbled.
“My reaction to that is any company that is slow to respond to market changes will get hurt and that’s the fault of the company,” Lee mentioned. “If there are better tools, then it’s their fault for not resorting to the better alternative to exist. I don’t feel guilty at all for not catering to a company’s inability to adapt.”
WATCH: How DeepSeek supercharged AI’s distillation situation
